Bibliographic referenceCitations
de Solla Price, D. J. (1963).Little science, big science. New York: Columbia University Press.52802560
Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Research policy, 29(2), 109-123.4439871
Etzkowitz, Henry, and Loet A. Leydesdorff (1997). Universities in the Global Knowledge Economy, London: Pinter Press.2585842
Garfield, E. (1972). Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation. Science (178), 471-479.21661155
Garfield, E.(1979). Citation indexing: Its theory and application in science, technology, and humanities . New York: Wiley.21301156
de Solla Price, D. J. (1965). Networks of Scientific Papers. Science, 149(3683), 510-515.2128981
Lotka, A. J. (1926). The frequency distribution of scientific productivity. Journal of Washington Academy Sciences , 16(12), 317-323.2090844
Small, H. G. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for information Science, 24(4), 265-269.1988832
Barabâsi, A. L., Jeong, H., Néda, Z., Ravasz, E., Schubert, A., & Vicsek, T. (2002). Evolution of the social network of scientific collaborations. Physica A: Statistical mechanics and its applications, 311(3), 590-614.1837750
Garfield, E. (1955). Citation Indexes for Science. Science, 122(3159), 108-111.1783767
Katz, J.S. & Martin, B.R. (1997). What is research collaboration?. Research policy, 26(1), 1-18.1594564
Garfield, E. (2006). The history and meaning of the journal impact factor. Jama,295(1), 90-93.1487596
Narin, F., Hamilton, K. S., & Olivastro, D. (1997). The increasing linkage between US technology and public science. Research Policy, 26(3), 317-330.1212383
de Solla Price, D. J. (1976). A General Theory of Bibliometric and Other Cumulative Advantage Processes. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 293-306.1144534
Pritchard, A. (1969). Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics?. Journal of documentation, (25), 348-349.1134255
White, H. D., & McCain, K. W. (1998). Visualizing a discipline: An author co-citation analysis of information science, 1972-1995. Journal of the American society for information science, 49(4), 327-355.1098405
Moed, H. F. (2006). Citation analysis in research evaluation (Vol. 9). Springer Science & Business Media.1060524
Harhoff, D., Narin, F., Scherer, F. M., & Vopel, K. (1999). Citation frequency and the value of patented inventions. Review of Economics and statistics, 81(3), 511-515.1024299
Salter, A J. & Martin, B. R. (2001). The economic benefits of publicly funded basic research: a critical review. Research policy, 30(3), 509-532.944254
de Solla Price, D. J., & Page, T. (1961). Science since Babylon. Yale University Press.936289
Bradford, S. C. (1934). Engineering: An Illustrated Weekly Journal, 137(5550), 176-180.876389
White, H. D., & Griffith, B. C. (1981). Author cocitation: A literature measure of intellectual structure. Journal of the American Society for information Science,32(3), 163-171.824353
Egghe, L., & Rousseau, R. (1990). "Introduction to informetrics: Quantitative methods in library, documentation and information science".Elsevier Science Publishers.818417
Almind, T. C., & Ingwersen, P. (1997). Informetric analyses on the World Wide Web: Methodological approaches to'webometrics'. Journal of documentation, 53(4), 404-426.743204
Brookes, B. C. (1980). The foundations of information science Part I. Philosophical aspects. Journal of information science, 2(3-4), 125-133.710178
Small, H. G. & Griffith, B. C. (1974). The Structure of Scientific Literatures I: Identifying and Graphing Specialties. Social Studies of Science, 4(1), 17-40.706383
Ingwersen, P. (1998). The calculation of web impact factors. Journal of documentation, 54(2), 236-243.693226
Leydesdorff, L., & Etzkowitz, H. (1996). Emergence of a Triple Helix of university—industry—government relations. Science and public policy, 23(5), 279-286.665137
McCain, K. W. (1990). Mapping authors in intellectual space: A technical overview.Journal of the American Society for Information Science (1986-1998), 41(6), 433.662267
Leydesdorff, L., & Etzkowitz, H. (1998). The triple helix as a model for innovation studies. Science and public policy, 25(3), 195-203.660123
Albert, M. B., Avery, D., Narin, F., & McAllister, P. (1991). Direct validation of citation counts as indicators of industrially important patents. Research policy,20(3), 251-259.654248
de Solla Price, D. J., & Beaver, D. (1966). Collaboration in an invisible college.American psychologist, 21(11), 1011.648286
Narin, F., Noma, E., & Perry, R. (1987). Patents as indicators of corporate technological strength. Research policy, 16(2), 143-155.633256
Cronin, B. (1984). The citation process. The role and significance of citations in scientific communication. London: Taylor Graham, 1984, 1.591347
Otte, E., & Rousseau, R. (2002). Social network analysis: a powerful strategy, also for the information sciences. Journal of information Science, 28(6), 441-453.587149
Martin, B.R. & Irvine, J. (1983). Assessing basic research: some partial indicators of scientific progress in radio astronomy. Research policy, 12(2), 61-90.572262
Garfield, E. (1999). Journal impact factor: a brief review. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 161(8), 979-980.549277
de Solla Price, D. J.. (1965, January). Statistical studies of networks of scientific papers. InStatistical Association Methods for Mechanized Documentation: Symposium Proceedings (Vol. 269, p. 187). US Government Printing Office.5421
Pinski, G., & Narin, F. (1976). Citation influence for journal aggregates of scientific publications: Theory, with application to the literature of physics. Information Processing & Management, 12(5), 297-312.537271
Wagner, C. S., & Leydesdorff, L. (2005). Network structure, self-organization, and the growth of international collaboration in science. Research policy, 34(10), 1608-1618.522214
Garfield, E. (1996). Fortnightly Review: How can impact factors be improved?.Bmj, 313(7054), 411-413.518275
Small, H. G. (1978). Cited documents as concept symbols. Social studies of science, 8(3), 327-340.504251
Moravcsik, M. J., & Murugesan, P. (1975). Some results on the function and quality of citations. Social studies of science, 5(1), 86-92.502276
van Raan, A. F. J. (2006). Comparison of the Hirsch-index with standard bibliometric indicators and with peer judgment for 147 chemistry research groups.scientometrics, 67(3), 491-502.499244
Irvine, J. & Martin, B. R. (1984). Foresight in science: Picking the winners. London: Pinter.498145
Garfield, E. (1979). Is citation analysis a legitimate evaluation tool?.Scientometrics, 1(4), 359-375.495226
Garfield, E. (1994). ‘The application of citation indexing to journals management.Current contents, 33, 3-5.495189
McMillan, G. S., Narin, F., & Deeds, D. L. (2000). An analysis of the critical role of public science in innovation: the case of biotechnology. Research policy, 29(1), 1-8.489158
White, H. D., & McCain, K. W. (1989). Bibliometrics. Annual review of information science and technology, 24, 119-186.474191
van Raan, A. F. J. (2005). Fatal attraction: Conceptual and methodological problems in the ranking of universities by bibliometric methods. Scientometrics, 62(1), 133-143.464228
Glänzel, W. (2001). National characteristics in international scientific co-authorship relations. Scientometrics, 51(1), 69-115.458219
Small, H. G. (1999). Visualizing science by citation mapping. Journal of the American society for Information Science, 50(9), 799-813.457236
Braun, T., Glänzel, W., & Schubert, A. (2006). A Hirsch-type index for journals.Scientometrics, 69(1), 169-173.453203
Cooke, P., & Leydesdorff, L. (2006). Regional development in the knowledge-based economy: The construction of advantage. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 31(1), 5-15.440120
Narin, F. (1976). Evaluative bibliometrics: The use of publication and citation analysis in the evaluation of scientific activity (pp. 206-219). Washington, D. C: Computer Horizons.439285
Jin, B., Liang, L., Rousseau, R., & Egghe, L. (2007). The R-and AR-indices: Complementing the h-index. Chinese science bulletin, 52(6), 855-863.439202
Martin, B.R. (1995). Foresight in science and technology. Technology analysis & strategic management, 7(2), 139-168.432119
Thelwall, M., Buckley, K., Paltoglou, G., Cai, D., & Kappas, A. (2010). Sentiment strength detection in short informal text. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(12), 2544-2558.43294
Moed, H. F.., De Bruin, R., & Van Leeuwen, T. H. (1995). New bibliometric tools for the assessment of national research performance: Database description, overview of indicators and first applications. Scientometrics, 33(3), 381-422.415240
Geuna, A. & Martin, B. R. (2003). University research evaluation and funding: An international comparison. Minerva, 41(4), 277-304.414114
Nalimov, V. V., & Mul'cenko, Z. M. (1969). Naukometrija: izucenie razvitija nauki kak informacionnogo processa. Nauka.410142
Garfield, E. (1964). Science Citation Index-A new dimension in indexing. Science,144(3619), 649-654.405159
Melin, G., & Persson, O. (1996). Studying research collaboration using co-authorships. Scientometrics, 36(3), 363-377.404181
de Solla Price, D. J.(1970). Citation measures of hard science, soft science, technology, and nonscience. Communication among scientists and engineers, 3-22.397291
Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (1998). The endless transition: a'Triple Helix'of university industry government relations. Minerva, 36(3), 203-208.38376
Luukkonen, T., Persson, O., & Sivertsen, G. (1992). Understanding patterns of international scientific collaboration. Science, Technology & Human Values, 17(1), 101-126.378196
Moed, H. F., Burger, W. J. M., Frankfort, J. G., & van Raan, A. F. J. (1985). The use of bibliometric data for the measurement of university research performance.Research Policy, 14(3), 131-149.369206
Zhou, P., & Leydesdorff, L. (2006). The emergence of China as a leading nation in science. Research Policy, 35(1), 83-104.365187
Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The triple helix: an evolutionary model of innovations.Research Policy, 29(2), 243-255.36481
Garfield, E., Sher, I. H., & Torpie, R. J. (1964). The use of citation data in writing the history of science. Institute for Scientific Information Inc Philadelphia, PA.363174
Leydesdorff, L. (2001). The challenge of scientometrics: The development, measurement, and self-organization of scientific communications. Universal-Publishers.36053
Narin, F. (1994). Patent bibliometrics. Scientometrics, 30(1), 147-155.352121
Leydesdorff, L., & Rafols, I. (2009). A global map of science based on the ISI subject categories. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(2), 348-362.351171
Ahlgren, P., Jarneving, B., & Rousseau, R. (2003). Requirements for a cocitation similarity measure, with special reference to Pearson's correlation coefficient.Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(6), 550-560.350167
Glänzel, W., & Schubert, A. (2005). Analysing scientific networks through co-authorship. In Handbook of quantitative science and technology research (pp. 257-276). Springer Netherlands.350147
Glänzel, W., & Moed, H. F. (2002). Journal impact measures in bibliometric research. Scientometrics, 53(2), 171-193.349181
Narin, F., Stevens, K., & Whitlow, E. (1991). Scientific co-operation in Europe and the citation of multinationally authored papers. Scientometrics, 21(3), 313-323.348178
Schubert, A., & Braun, T. (1986). Relative indicators and relational charts for comparative assessment of publication output and citation impact. Scientometrics,9(5-6), 281-291.340211
Björneborn, L., & Ingwersen, P. (2004). Toward a basic framework for webometrics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55(14), 1216-1227.33881
van Raan, A. F. J. (1996). Advanced bibliometric methods as quantitative core of peer review based evaluation and foresight exercises. Scientometrics, 36(3), 397-420.327156
de Solla Price, D. J. (1965). Is technology historically independent of science? A study in statistical historiography. Technology and Culture, 6(4), 553-568.319127
Schubert, A., Glänzel, W., & Braun, T. (1989). Scientometric datafiles. A comprehensive set of indicators on 2649 journals and 96 countries in all major science fields and subfields 1981–1985. Scientometrics, 16(1), 3-478.318181
Garfield, E., & Sher, I. H. (1963). New factors in the evaluation of scientific literature through citation indexing. American documentation, 14(3), 195-201313153
Martin, B.R. & Irvine, J. (1989). Research Foresight: Priority-setting in science(Vol. 28). London: Pinter.30998
Thelwall, M., Buckley, K., & Paltoglou, G. (2011). Sentiment in Twitter events. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,62(2), 406-418.30981
Braam, R. R., Moed, H. F., & van Raan, A. F. J. (1991). Mapping of science by combined co-citation and word analysis, I. Structural aspects. JASIS, 42(4), 233-251.300152
White, H. D. (2003). Pathfinder networks and author cocitation analysis: A remapping of paradigmatic information scientists. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(5), 423-434.300124
Björneborn, L., & Ingwersen, P. (2001). Perspective of webometrics.Scientometrics, 50(1), 65-82.300100
Narin, F., & Noma, E. (1985). Is technology becoming science?. Scientometrics,7(3-6), 369-381.296117
van Raan, A. F. J. (2005). Measuring science. In Handbook of quantitative science and technology research (pp. 19-50). Springer Netherlands.292132
Cronin, B., & Meho, L. (2006). Using the h-index to rank influential information scientistss. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(9), 1275-1278.288142
Brookes, B. C. (1969). Bradford's law and the bibliography of science. Nature,224(5223), 953.287159
Carpenter, M. P., Narin, F., & Woolf, P. (1981). Citation rates to technologically important patents. World Patent Information, 3(4), 160-163.28799
Thelwall, M. (2008). Social networks, gender, and friending: An analysis of MySpace member profiles.Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(8), 1321-1330.28779
Moed, H. F. (2010). Measuring contextual citation impact of scientific journals.Journal of Informetrics, 4(3), 265-277.286133
Persson, O., Glänzel, W., & Danell, R. (2004). Inflationary bibliometric values: The role of scientific collaboration and the need for relative indicators in evaluative studies. Scientometrics, 60(3), 421-432.281138
Thelwall, M., Vaughan, L., & Björneborn, L. (2005). Webometrics. Annual review of information science and technology, 39(1), 81-135.27977
Leydesdorff, L. A. (2001). The transformation of university-industry-government relations. Electronic Journal of Sociology, 5(4).27736
Small, H. G., & Sweeney, E. (1985). Clustering the science citation index® using co-citations: I. A comparison of methods. Scientometrics, 7(3-6), 391-409.276141
Garfield, E. (1984). Current Comments@. Curr Contents, 27(23), 3.275127
Martin, B.R. (1996). The use of multiple indicators in the assessment of basic research. Scientometrics, 36(3), 343-362.274123
Egghe, L., & Rousseau, R. (2006). An informetric model for the Hirsch-index.Scientometrics, 69(1), 121-129.269155
López Piñero, J. M. (1979). Ciencia y técnica en la sociedad española de los siglos XVI y XVII. Labor26975
Vaughan, L., & Thelwall, M. (2004). Search engine coverage bias: evidence and possible causes.Information processing & management, 40(4), 693-707.26893
Leydesdorff, L. (1998). Theories of citation?. Scientometrics, 43(1), 5-25.265116
Persson, O. (1994). The intellectual base and research fronts of JASIS 1986–1990. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 45(1), 31-38.26498
Leydesdorff, L. (2006). The knowledge-based economy: Modeled, measured, simulated. Universal-Publishers.2612
Narin, F., & Olivastro, D. (1992). Status report: linkage between technology and science. Research policy, 21(3), 237-249.25895
Glänzel, W. (2006). On the h-index-A mathematical approach to a new measure of publication activity and citation impact. Scientometrics, 67(2), 315-321.255103
Leydesdorff, L., & Vaughan, L. (2006). Co-occurrence matrices and their applications in information science: extending ACA to the web environment.Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology, 57(12), 1616-1628.254111
Prabowo, R., & Thelwall, M. (2009). Sentiment analysis: A combined approach. Journal of Informetrics, 3(2), 143-157.25459
Thelwall, M. (2004). Link analysis: An information science approach.253116
Martin, B.R. & Johnston, R. (1999). Technology foresight for wiring up the national innovation system: experiences in Britain, Australia, and New Zealand.Technological forecasting and social change, 60(1), 37-54.25356
Garfield, E. (1965, December). Can citation indexing be automated. In Statistical association methods for mechanized documentation, symposium proceedings (Vol. 1, pp. 189-92).25046
Leydesdorff, L. (2007). Betweenness centrality as an indicator of the interdisciplinarity of scientific journals. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(9), 1303-1319.249101
Cronin, B. (2001). Bibliometrics and beyond: some thoughts on web-based citation analysis. Journal of Information science, 27(1), 1-7.248117
Small, H. G. (1977). A Co-Citation Model of a Scientific Specialty: A Longitudinal Study of Collagen Research. Social Studies of Science, 7(2), 139-166.246130
Van Leeuwen, T., Moed, H. F., Tijssen, R., Visser, M., & van Raan, A. F. J. (2001). Language biases in the coverage of the Science Citation Index and its consequencesfor international comparisons of national research performance.Scientometrics, 51(1), 335-346.246124
Leydesdorff, L., & Meyer, M. (2006). Triple Helix indicators of knowledge-based innovation systems: Introduction to the special issue. Research policy, 35(10), 1441-1449.24648
Luukkonen, T., Tijssen, R., Persson, O., & Sivertsen, G. (1993). The measurement of international scientific collaboration. Scientometrics, 28(1), 15-36.244117
Thelwall, M. (2001). Extracting macroscopic information from web links. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,52(13), 1157-1168.244110
Park, H. W., & Thelwall, M. (2003). Hyperlink analyses of the World Wide Web: A review. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 8(4), 0-0.2441
Griffith, B. C., Small, H. G., Stonehill, J. A., & Dey, S. (1974). The structure of scientific literatures II: Toward a macro-and microstructure for science. Social Studies of Science, 4(4), 339-365.243155
Ingwersen, P. (1982). Search procedures in the library-analysed from the cognitive point of view. Journal of documentation, 38(3), 165-191.242110
Cronin, B. (2001). Hyperauthorship: A postmodern perversion or evidence of a structural shift in scholarly communication practices?. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(7), 558-569.237122
Braun, T., Glänzel, W., & Schubert, A. (2006). A Hirsch-type index for journals.Scientometrics, 69(1), 169-173.236203
Moed, H. F. (2002). The impact-factors debate: the ISI's uses and limits. Nature,415(6873), 731-732.235111
Moed, H. F., & Van Leeuwen, T. N. (1995). Improving the Accuracy of Institute for Scientific Informations's Journal Impact Factors. JASIS, 46(6), 461-467.231136
White, H. D. (2009). Scientific communication and literature retrieval. The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis, 2, 51-71.Russell Sage Foundation23018
Moed, H. F., Glänzel, W., & Schmoch, U. (2005). Editors’ Introduction (pp. 1-15). Springer Netherlands.2258
Martin, B.R. & Etzkowitz, H. (2000). The origin and evolution of the university species. VEST: Swedish Journal for Science and Technology Studies, 13(3-4), 9-34.22232
Garfield, E. (2003). The meaning of the impact factor. Revista internacional de psicología clínica y de la salud= International journal of clinical and health psychology, 3(2), 363-369.22066
Thelwall, M. (2009). Introduction to webometrics: Quantitative web research for the social sciences.Synthesis lectures on information concepts, retrieval, and services, 1(1), 1-116.22055
van Raan, A. F. J. (Ed.). (2013). Handbook of quantitative studies of science and technology. Elsevier.2200
Griffith, B. C., & Mullins, N. C. (1972). Coherent social groups in scientific change. Science, 177(4053), 959-964.219137
Kousha, K., & Thelwall, M. (2007). Google Scholar citations and Google Web/URL citations: A multi-discipline exploratory analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(7), 1055-1065.21896
López Piñero, J. M., & Terrada Ferrandis, M. L. (1992). Los indicadores bibliométricos y la evaluación de la actividad médico-científica: los indicadores de producción, circulación y dispersión, consumo de la información y repercusión.Medicina clínica, 98(4), 142-148.21859
Narin, F., Pinski, G., & Gee, H. H. (1976). Structure of the biomedical literature.Journal of the American society for information science, 27(1), 25-45.217120
McCain, K.W. (1991). Mapping economics through the journal literature: An experiment in journal cocitation analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42(4), 290-296.21780
Wilkinson, D., Harries, G., Thelwall, M., & Price, L. (2003). Motivations for academic Web site interlinking: Evidence for the Web as a novel source of information on informal scholarly communication.Journal of information science, 29(1), 49-56.21754
Glänzel, W. (2002). Coauthorship patterns and trends in the sciences (1980-1998): A bibliometric study with implications for database indexing and search strategies.Library trends, 50(3), 461-473.21698
White, H. D. (2001). Authors as citers over time. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(2), 87-108.21697
Garfield, E. (1986). Which medical journals have the greatest impact?. Annals of Internal Medicine, 105(2), 313-320.214135
Brookes, B. C. (1968). The derivation and application of the Bradford-Zipf distribution. Journal of Documentation, 24(4), 247-265.214119
Schubert, A., & Braun, T. (1990). International collaboration in the sciences 1981–1985. Scientometrics, 19(1-2), 3-10.211105
Moed, H. F., & Vanleeuwen, T. N. (1996). Impact factors can mislead. Nature,381(6579), 186-186.210125
Martin, B.R. (2003). The changing social contract for science and the evolution of the university. Science and innovation: Rethinking the rationales for funding and governance. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 7-29.2092
White, H. D., & McCain, K. W. (1997). Visualization of Literatures. Annual review of information science and technology (ARIST), 32, 99-168.20686
van Raan, A. F. J. (2004). Sleeping beauties in science. Scientometrics, 59(3), 467-472.20287
Small, H. G., & Garfield, E. (1985). The geography of sciencew: disciplinary and national mappings. Journal of information science, 11(4), 147-159.200128
López Piñero, J. M., & Terrada Ferrandis, M. L. (1992). Los indicadores bibliométricos y la evaluación de la actividad médico-científica: usos y abusos de la bibliometría. Medicina clínica, 98(2), 64-68.20041